3 ms·
Murdering ex-spies on the streets of Salisbury with chemical weapons certainly seems like the appropriate response, yes. Its not appropriate response, that is
by fdsak 9y ago
Murdering ex-spies on the streets of Salisbury with chemical weapons certainly seems like the appropriate response, yes.
Its not appropriate response, that is way everyone is skeptical. Why use a missile when you can kill the bird with a slingshot ?
- EliRivers 9y agoIts not appropriate response, that is way everyone is skeptical. Ah, I see. You're derailing the conversation. You've tried to change it to "because murdering an ex-spy with a chemical weapon on the streets of Salisbury is not an appropriate response to the West's actions in the middle east, it can't have been Russia who did it." You've been rumbled. Jog on.
- fdsak 9y agoYou've been rumbled. Jog on My argument was two pronged. 1) UK lied in several cases or most of the cases and now UK==lier so Once a lier always a lier 2) Its not me or Russian who rumbled , but instead it is and it was West( France in case of Libya, UK in case of Iraq, US in case of Syria) has be rumbled.