3 ms·
Unless the article has been published as open access under a CC-BY (or similar) licence, it's not open access, please don't confuse the two. I agree with you i
by lsh 9y ago
Unless the article has been published as open access under a CC-BY (or similar) licence, it's not open access, please don't confuse the two.
I agree with you in spirit - tax payer funded research outputs should be publicly available - but this is what got Aaron Swartz: it is unlawful.
- Mononokay 9y agoI never said the research was open-access, I said it allowed open-access to research. There's a difference, and although it's just positioning, it makes quite a difference in the meaning of a sentence.