3 ms·
> It's universally understood why the media wasn't interested in turning that story into a scandal. I agree that it's bad (not just looks bad), but you can't b
by bb88 9y ago
> It's universally understood why the media wasn't interested in turning that story into a scandal.
I agree that it's bad (not just looks bad), but you can't blame the media for something they didn't know about. Fox News went on for years about Benghazi. So in 2018, you can't complain about media being too friendly to democrats.
Also, the piece links to a tweet[1] in 2018, not an article from 2012.
[1] https://twitter.com/cld276/status/975568208886484997 https://twitter.com/cld276/status/975568208886484997
- bordercases 9y agofox news != media and you know it.
- bb88 9y agoThis link says otherwise: http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2014/01/FT_Fox_News.png http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/20...
- bordercases 9y agoThat's interesting but it's also just television. I'd ask what the rural/urban split is on television versus Internet syndication, and then see what comes out on top.