4 ms·
> Further, this was NOT about providing ads, instead the data personal information was shared with a third party without this being explicitly consented to. Peo
by flukus 9y ago
> Further, this was NOT about providing ads, instead the data personal information was shared with a third party without this being explicitly consented to. People have been profiled without this been explicit, further no consent was given.
Is it personal information? AFAIK the facebook T&C states that as soon as you put information into facebook it is their data. You're giving something away freely an then complaining about how the recipient uses it.
Facebook may have broken some laws and they are definitely a scummy company, but the onus is still on people not to give away their private data.
- Khaine 9y agoIt doesn't matter what facebook's terms say. It matters what the law of the land says.
- flukus 9y agoThe law of the land says assault and murder are illegal but it's still a good idea to take self defense lessons and to avoid areas with a heightened risk. In a perfect world you can rely on the law of the land but in the real world you can't. A world where you data is traveling in and out of multiple jurisdictions around the world is even further from perfect.
- squiggleblaz 9y agoNone of which recovers your earlier statements. If a person beats you up, they are liable to penalty of law and you are entitled to complain - no matter where you were or what self defence training you'd taken, or that they'd buried a clause in a hard-to-understand and unavoidable contract for a service they'd offered you that said "we can randomly beat you up".
- flukus 9y agoThe person will be prosecuted, but you'll still have been beaten up. Unless you change you're behavior there is a good likelyhood that you'll get beaten up again. Justice may be served but it's still not as good as not having been beaten up in the first place.
- Retra 9y agoThe application of legal penalties should be deterrent enough. If they are not, they should be made more severe. The whole reason we have laws is to help people protect other people. If we expected everyone to protect themselves, we'd have no use for law. This is exactly why victim blaming is pointless and stupid.
- flukus 9y agoNo laws will ever be strict enough to prevent crime, the countries with the harshest laws in the world still suffer from it. Legal penalties don't matter to people not thinking far enough ahead for them to enter the equation. They don't matter to people who think they can get away with breaking the law (much easier for electronic crime) and they don't matter to people who think they are above the law, which may be he case here. Harsher penalties can even be counter-productive. If you're on death row for killing one person then you better make sure you kill any potential witnesses, the penalty is the same either way. > This is exactly why victim blaming is pointless and stupid. Fine, I'm being pointless and stupid. But if you don't care who you're giving your data too then don't expect me to care next time it ends up with someone you didn't want.
- Erlangolem 9y agoFine, I'm being pointless and stupid. But if you don't care who you're giving your data too then don't expect me to care next time it ends up with someone you didn't want. I’ve never had a Facebook account, yet friends and family do, and through them they can get info on me. You don’t have to care though, and I’ll just get with not caring about you. Meanwhile the public at large is starting to care, and your attitude won’t impress them any more than it does me.
- Retra 9y agoSure, legal penalties don't stop people who don't believe in them. But we believe in legal penalties, so we put people in prisons. Even if they don't believe in them. >then don't expect me to care next time it ends up with someone you didn't want. You say that until someone gives your information away for you. Then you'll be crying about how unfair it is that nobody else protected you. Possibly from threats you didn't even know existed.