I don't think the rude dismissal is warranted. I think the point retube was trying to reference is that studies have shown that people vastly overestimate the

I don't think the rude dismissal is warranted. I think the point retube was trying to reference is that studies have shown that people vastly overestimate the magnitude and duration of changes in happiness due to a windfall or catastrophe (the most recent source I have for this is Dan Ariely's Upside of Irrationality). While there is a shift of overall life satisfaction, major changes are much less impactful to your long-term happiness than you would predict (presumably due to growing familiarity, adaptation, and the general "the grass is greener" bias we all have). At any rate, I, specifically, would be happier without reading personally-attacking rebuttals on HN. Is that really needed to make your point?