The "geographic resiliency" chart is pretty inaccurate for the major providers, especially folks like Google cloud that have multi regional offerings with 99.9

The "geographic resiliency" chart is pretty inaccurate for the major providers, especially folks like Google cloud that have multi regional offerings with 99.95% availability & a lot more than "1" for redundancy. I'd also add - unless you are going to include a median/mean latency number many options will look absurdly good even though we know they're a horrible idea, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GmailFS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GmailFS. I also think "unknown" availability looks a lot like a durability issue..