3 ms·
Not quite. The paper cited above [0] Figure 2 pg 17 shows conductivity as a function of temperature. A superconductor has a flat part of the conductivity at low
by idanman 9y ago
Not quite. The paper cited above [0] Figure 2 pg 17 shows conductivity as a function of temperature. A superconductor has a flat part of the conductivity at low temperature here they have not reached it. There is no transition [1].
The do say on page 8 of [0]:
"Extending this approach to stabilize the
dispersionless states similarly expected from the kagome network adds an exciting prospect
for increasing correlations and enabling the study of magnetically driven fractionalization of
states" So it may be a possibility in the future.
[0] https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.10007 https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.10007
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconductivity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconductivity
- garmaine 9y agoThank you for finding the source. Looks like this was inaccurate / ambiguous reporting. Still a great discovery for what it is.