4 ms·
Even in Java: if you want your fluent builder to be extensible, that's easy enough to achieve with a base class that returns a generic self type in the fluent m
by usrusr 9y ago
Even in Java: if you want your fluent builder to be extensible, that's easy enough to achieve with a base class that returns a generic self type in the fluent methods. If lack of extensibility is the strongest criticism of fluency, then fluency must be great.