3 ms·
We definitely owe them enough money that they could comfortably fill the payment gap to their next job (which might be never, meaning enough money to pay for in
by marvin 9y ago
We definitely owe them enough money that they could comfortably fill the payment gap to their next job (which might be never, meaning enough money to pay for inflation-adjusted lost income during the entire remainder of their career).
But in the name of pragmatism, it is unlikely that whistleblowers would blow the whistle on a purely economical basis if the reward wasn't higher than that.
- maxxxxx 9y agoThen we should also pay whistleblowers who report environmental issues a lot of money. I don't think that's the case.