5 ms·
There can be several ways to explain this but generally speaking you are right. It shouldn’t go over the speed limit, and under no circumstances should it take
by ronilan 9y ago
There can be several ways to explain this but generally speaking you are right.
It shouldn’t go over the speed limit, and under no circumstances should it take the liberty drivers usually take of being within 10% above the limit.
I hope no one wrote it that way.
- emodendroket 9y agoI don't think that's true at all. There was an article posted about the subject a while ago, but the thrust of it was that researchers think they need to do more to make cars behave like (fully attentive) human drivers rather than being weird anomalies that behave in surprising/irritating (to humans) ways if they're going to actually go on the road, and I think that's completely right.
- BillTheBiker 9y ago"(fully attentive) human drivers" probably cause deadly accidents every day, and they certainly behave in surprising/irritating ways. Anyways, a human driver going the speed limit is no hazard, so I fail to see how having self-driving cars follow the limits could be a problem.
- emodendroket 9y agoAutonomous cars need to share the road with human drivers, so they should not behave in a way that is surprising to humans, to the extent possible.
- CamperBob2 9y agoWhy not? The range between 1-10 MPH over the speed limit is statistically the safest. (Yes, I know, good luck finding a citation for a study I read 20 years ago...) It's hard to argue against the notion that you're safest when you keep up with prevailing traffic. That means that self-driving cars shouldn't be programmed to go slower. Speed limits are usually too low. Often they have nothing to do with engineering or safety considerations, but are primarily revenue-oriented. If the advent of autonomous vehicles forces regulators to listen to the engineers for a change, that will be an unalloyed Good Thing.
- URSpider94 9y agoMan, sorry for the downvotes. This link -> http://www.lsp.org/pdf/troopc85thSpeed.pdf http://www.lsp.org/pdf/troopc85thSpeed.pdf doesn't include any references, unfortunately, but the statements are that: -- 55% of drivers regularly exceed the speed limit, meaning that the speed limit represents the 45th percentile speed -- driving between the 50th and 90th percentile speeds is the safest Taken together, driving at the speed limit is significantly unsafe.
- chopin 9y agoAs far as I understand your comment, driving at the speed limit is unsafe because everybody is speeding. Sounds like a self-fulfilling thing. Maybe it would be even safer if the majority would obey the speed limit?
- URSpider94 9y agoDid you read the link I posted? Theres lots of empirical data out there that says that drivers drive the same speed on a road, regardless of the posted limit. That speed is based on their judgment of the road - sight lines, shoulder width, sharpness of curves, etc.
- TheCoelacanth 9y agoPeople speed because of poor road design and poor enforcement of speed limits.
- CamperBob2 9y agoJust curious (and not trying to challenge or be confrontational), how long have you held a driver's license?
- CamperBob2 9y agoAnd the idea that the speed limit itself is the problem... is there any room in your worldview for that possibility? Why not lower it to 5 MPH on a nationwide basis? Think of all the lives that would save!