I don't get it. I have an insane amount of respect for anyone who manages to get a game of any quality out the door (it's stressful, tedious, repetitive (testi

I don't get it. I have an insane amount of respect for anyone who manages to get a game of any quality out the door (it's stressful, tedious, repetitive (testing, at least), ...), so I really hope this isn't taken as a slight against the developer(s) -- it's not intended in that way in the least. I think the reviewer is doing a huge disservice to the developer with this review, however pure his intentions may be. He's showing screenshots with insanely low-poly objects, two-color, repetitive textures, and clunky terrain, while raving about the graphical quality. Instead of that, focus on the gameplay, story, anything -- something that indie devs can actually compete on, because graphical quality certainly isn't it.