I'm saying that it's not "horrible abuse" because: a) I've spent a reasonable amount of time around horses; b) Can see nothing in that photo to suggest the ho

I'm saying that it's not "horrible abuse" because: a) I've spent a reasonable amount of time around horses; b) Can see nothing in that photo to suggest the horse has been mistreated or is distressed; and c) Find this kind of trivialization of animal abuse by someone who has little experience with horses to be offensive nonsense. There's real "horrible abuse" out there, and this is most emphatically not an example of it.