> maybe what people need is a better grasp on probability and statistics Definitely, though my interpretation of your statement is "self driving cars have only

> maybe what people need is a better grasp on probability and statistics Definitely, though my interpretation of your statement is "self driving cars have only killed a couple people ever but human cars have killed hundreds of thousands". If that's correct, that's not going to win anyone over nor is it necessarily correct. While the state of AZ definitely has some responsibility for allowing testing of the cars on their roads, Uber needs (imo) to be able to prove the bug that caused the accident was so much of an edge case that they couldn't easily have been able to foresee it. Are they even testing this shit on private tracks as much as possible before releasing anything on public roads? How much are they ensuring a human driver is paying attention?