3 ms·
If we're going that way, you might as well include that particular file only on that page.
by sebazzz 9y ago
If we're going that way, you might as well include that particular file only on that page.
- pg_bot 9y agoI would rather have one single request for a large static asset, than multiple small requests for per page based css. In my experience CSS files typically fall in the range 50-100KB. I'd rather not have to pay the perf penalty every time I load a new page considering the typical file size.
- no_wizard 9y agoFor what its worth, this is no longer the case with HTTP/2, which is up and coming for most sites (I hope). I imagine in a few years time this will be gone with the wind (hopefully). see https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1r7QXGYOLCh4fcUq0jDdDwKJWNqWK1o4xMtYpKZCJYjM/edit#slide=id.g518e3c87f_0_318 https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1r7QXGYOLCh4fcUq0jDdD... and https://medium.com/@asyncmax/the-right-way-to-bundle-your-assets-for-faster-sites-over-http-2-437c37efe3ff https://medium.com/@asyncmax/the-right-way-to-bundle-your-as...