3 ms·
Not at all. You had mentioned military testing, which is safe in early stages, and I addressed that first: the testing process does follow through into live en
by ivl 9y ago
Not at all. You had mentioned military testing, which is safe in early stages, and I addressed that first: the testing process does follow through into live environments. Where things can go wrong.
But no, medical testing doesn't kill tens of thousands, practiced medicine does. I may have read your post wrong an figured you meant medicine in practice separately from military testing. There's research to suggest mistakes are the third leading cause of death in the US [1]. My point wasn't so much that killing random bystanders is okay, but that there's a level of unintended death in both, and not just in testing. Society decides what's acceptable, and if for miles driven the number of deaths that self driving vehicles cause is lower than the number of deaths caused by human drivers per miles driven, well... I'd say that's a fair way to look at it.
1. http://www.bmj.com/content/353/bmj.i2139 http://www.bmj.com/content/353/bmj.i2139
- Piskvorrr 9y agoOkay, that does sound far more reasonable than comparing dead people to a part of a recipe.