3 ms·
I had assumed this to be because their earnings were so small. For example Tesla has an undefined P/E ratio since it's a divide by zero. I had also assumed this
by JonasJSchreiber 9y ago
I had assumed this to be because their earnings were so small. For example Tesla has an undefined P/E ratio since it's a divide by zero. I had also assumed this to occur when a company sacrificed short term profitability for higher adoption.
EDIT: not sure why the downvotes, but maybe because I'd incorrectly assumed earnings to a non-negative number. Still TSLA's P/E is N/A according to the few sites I've checked:
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/TSLA/ https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/TSLA/
https://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/tsla https://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/tsla
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/tsla https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/tsla
https://stocktwits.com/symbol/TSLA https://stocktwits.com/symbol/TSLA
- garmaine 9y agoTSLA does not have zero earnings.
- rrdharan 9y agoCorrect, they have negative earnings, and their P/E is also correspondingly a negative number: https://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/tsla/pe-ratio https://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/tsla/pe-ratio
- nabla9 9y agoNegative earnings are not genrally used when calculating P/E ratio. TSLA had price per losses ratio something like -30 last year.