3 ms·
EDIT: Yeah this was a bit reactionary on my part. I get it, it's not over the $150. It tells a lot about Uber that they weren't willing to fork over $150 for a
by Mononokay 9y ago
EDIT: Yeah this was a bit reactionary on my part. I get it, it's not over the $150.
It tells a lot about Uber that they weren't willing to fork over $150 for a permit.
- aetherson 9y agoIt does say a lot about Uber, but clearly the $150 was not the issue. They didn't want to report disengagements.
- jstanley 9y agoIt's more likely that they couldn't be bothered with the associated process than that they couldn't afford the $150.
- Judgmentality 9y agoIt had nothing to do with the $150, but part of accepting the permit is taking legal responsibility to report disengagement from autonomous testing. Uber didn't want to share this information since it would make them look bad.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- creato 9y agoIt wasn't about the $150, it was about not sharing data about the status of their program. I'm not sure which is worse.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]