4 ms·

Dude, none of the things you mentioned in the level design were possible in Doom's engine.

• Splines 16y ago
  Ah, chalk it up to fuzzy nostalgia. I swore that the mirrors actually were functional, and you could damage stuff that was on the sidewalk with the boot-kick. Maybe I'm mixing it up with other FPS games of the time. It's been a while.
  • chbarts 16y ago
    > I swore that the mirrors actually were functional, and you could damage stuff that was on the sidewalk with the boot-kick. Both true. Neither possible with the Doom engine.
  • Splines 16y ago
    (and chalk the reply up to poor reading comprehension. I understand what you mean now)
• ks 16y ago
  I think you are right. I remember Duke as technically more advance than Doom 2 I found something here: http://doom.wikia.com/wiki/Duke_Nukem_3D http://doom.wikia.com/wiki/Duke_Nukem_3D "While Doom and Duke Nukem 3D feature similar technology, Duke Nukem 3D could in most respects be considered technically superior. The player can jump, crouch, and aim up or down. The rendering engine features slopes, overlapping and moving sectors, arbitrary scaling of textures and strong scripting capabilities"