3 ms·
What are you on about? The author is counting rows in a database and checks how much time it takes the database to process the query. Counting rows is easily pa
by heavenlyblue 9y ago
What are you on about? The author is counting rows in a database and checks how much time it takes the database to process the query. Counting rows is easily parallelisable.
So are many problems, and we still are at a point where we are creating languages and frameworks that allow us to work with the data at a higher level: e.g. theano, numpy or TensorFlow.
Speed of light is only an issue for latency-sensitive operations: e.g. if every sub-operation is non-commutative in a given transaction then it would be expected to be completed before any other sub-operation.
- tabtab 9y agoRe: Speed of light is only an issue for latency-sensitive operations That was my point: if you don't care about data being "fresh" and consistent (per transaction coordination) you CAN throw mass parallelism at the problem. If you do care, then the speed of light is the bottleneck.
- tabtab 9y agoClarification: "mass parallelism" may also involve distributed and duplicated data sets.