3 ms·
Because by doing a standard deduction you're keeping certain mathematical properties that VATs provide, like the ability to sell a good multiple times without p
by 3pt14159 9y ago
Because by doing a standard deduction you're keeping certain mathematical properties that VATs provide, like the ability to sell a good multiple times without paying layered taxes. Standard deductions stop this warping while still providing the warping that is desired.
And saying a VAT is paid by the consumer is silly. All taxes are paid by the consumer ultimately. What matters is capturing the taxation in a locality where the infrastructure used is roughly paid for by entities utilizing it. If CocaCola sells $10B of Coke in the EU, a VAT captures that and it should. If a financial services firm sends someone out to consult the Saudi Government the transaction is (and should be) outside the EU. When the income is repatriated is when corporate taxes kick in to cover the infrastructure that is engaged with production.
Too high of a VAT and firms shift manufacturing jurisdiction since VATs naturally discourage exports. Too high of a corporate tax and firms keep corporate income offshore and lobby for reduced taxation rates.
- kgwgk 9y ago> If CocaCola sells $10B of Coke in the EU, a VAT captures that and it should. If I understand correctly, you propose to eliminate corporate taxes and go from the current system (taxes on consumption and taxes on corporate profits) to a pure consumption-tax system. In that case, when CocaCola sells $10B or LossMakingSoda sells $10B (or ExtremelyProfitableCo sells $10B) the taxman gets the same amount (directly from the consumer, and not just conceptually). It’s natural that governments want to extract more money from those companies that have more money.