4 ms·
The abstract claims there was no difference only 70% of the time. So 30% of the time there was a difference. Unsurprisingly it greatly limits the kind of data
by dwheeler 9y ago
The abstract claims there was no difference only 70% of the time. So 30% of the time there was a difference. Unsurprisingly it greatly limits the kind of data analysis that was allowed, which greatly reduces the applicability even if you believe it. I'm pretty dubious of this work anyway.