3 ms·
I think people might be missing the finer details of this story. This is an example of the system working the way it is supposed to. They are getting a warran
by pmorici 9y ago
I think people might be missing the finer details of this story. This is an example of the system working the way it is supposed to. They are getting a warrant and asking for very narrowly scoped information. If you take your argument to the logical extreme then businesses shouldn't have security cameras either. No crime would ever be solved.
- user5994461 9y agoThere can be hundreds of people in any venue. There can be more than ten thousands in a skyscraper. Everyone in an "area" is not necessarily a narrow scope.
- pmorici 9y agoThat is why it is reviewed by a judge. No one is suggesting there is a one size fits all test. If you look at the location of the first example given in the article though it is a suburban area and only asks for records within 150 Meters for two different 1 hours period when the suspect is known to have been in the area based off video footage of the scene.