3 ms·
>"disrupting the gate schedule and inconveniencing perhaps thousands of other passengers to allow one person to disembark? Sounds unreasonable to me." I'm sorr
by bogomipz 9y ago
>"disrupting the gate schedule and inconveniencing perhaps thousands of other passengers to allow one person to disembark? Sounds unreasonable to me."
I'm sorry where did you get the idea that this has anything to do with allowing "one person to disembark."
The Tarmac Delay Rule referenced in the article and referenced in the OPs comment prevents airline's from keeping passengers on the tarmac for greater than 3 hours[1].
It seems pretty reasonable to let people back into the airport after 3 hours of sitting in a cramped seat on the tarmac.
[1] https://www.transportation.gov/briefing-room/new-dot-consumer-rule-limits-airline-tarmac-delays-provides-other-passenger https://www.transportation.gov/briefing-room/new-dot-consume...
- jessriedel 9y ago> I'm sorry where did you get the idea that this has anything to do with allowing "one person to disembark." Presumably from the "kidnapping" talk in someone1234's comment. I also interpreted at one or a small number of people wanting to return to the terminal at the price of additional delays for everyone else.
- joering2 9y agoEveryone wants to come back to the gate. Source: myself being stuck on tarmack for 2 hours 45 minutes with 180 people, no AC, and “seatbelt on” sign (no way to get up to stretch your bones)
- jessriedel 9y agoThis doesn't contradict my comment.