4 ms·
> But then we eventually find that we needed more features after all, so we gradually re-implement them again until the cycle repeats. If the protocols and sta
by an_d_rew 9y ago
> But then we eventually find that we needed more features after all, so we gradually re-implement them again until the cycle repeats.
If the protocols and standards were designed lock-step with concrete implementation, I'd agree with you.
But too much of SOAP, CORBA, yada-yada was designed _before_ any implementation occurred. So they are nasty and cruft-filled long before even version 1.0.
Protocol Buffers ain't perfect, but they've been vastly deployed and hugely battle tested, so their ratio of cruft/useful remains tolerably low.
- jchw 9y agoSOAP was overdesigned and yet somehow still underspecified at the same time. You could implement two different implementations that both followed the specs religiously that could not interop at all. It's hard to overstate how crappy working with SOAP really was. I think as the industry matures we really will see serialization formats and protocols stabilize, I think we've already seen a bit of it with JSON.