4 ms·
I guess the question is, what are you willing to give up to hit 120 or 240 fps? Most games that I'm aware of won't probably won't hit 120 fps today even if run
by Merad 9y ago
I guess the question is, what are you willing to give up to hit 120 or 240 fps? Most games that I'm aware of won't probably won't hit 120 fps today even if run on the most powerful hardware at the lowest graphics settings. Even if you take games from a decade ago on today's best hardware, you probably won't see 240 fps.
- mastax 9y agoThat's a pretty big exaggeration. Taken from the first GPU review I looked at, a GTX 1070 Ti can run DOOM (the new one) at ultra settings at 170 FPS. [1] Sure that's a bit faster than an average gamer's card, and DOOM is better optimized than many games. But the most powerful hardware running a decade old game at low settings will easily get several hundred FPS. (It's hard to find benchmarks of this, though, so I settled for a recent game at Max quality). The counterexample is games which were designed for fixed 30fps which fall apart at higher framerates, but those are generally limited to Bethesda games and Japanese console ports. [1] https://www.anandtech.com/show/12373/the-evga-geforce-gtx-1070-ti-ftw2-review/7 https://www.anandtech.com/show/12373/the-evga-geforce-gtx-10...
- tazard 9y agoI know the Counter-Strike: Global Offence community always goes for extremely high FPS. I found this without much effort [1] where they discuss how to raise the fps cap from only 300. It's a game from 2012. [1] https://steamcommunity.com/app/730/discussions/0/154644787621566914/ https://steamcommunity.com/app/730/discussions/0/15464478762...
- tracker1 9y agoBut not at 4K... In the end, I'd rather hit 60fps at 4K before 144fps at 1080p.