1. Obama's use of social media was reported. 2. Why is whatever Obama did relevant to this story? Do two wrongs make a right? 3. Where in the linked article d

1. Obama's use of social media was reported. 2. Why is whatever Obama did relevant to this story? Do two wrongs make a right? 3. Where in the linked article does the journalist inject their own opinion? I couldn't find any instances. The opinions came from the interview subjects, and are reported by the journalist as they should be.