3 ms·
Exactly. In hindsight, it's clear it wasn't going to turn into a radiation release worse than Chernobyl. But at the time of the evacuation, not enough was known
by russdill 9y ago
Exactly. In hindsight, it's clear it wasn't going to turn into a radiation release worse than Chernobyl. But at the time of the evacuation, not enough was known. With so many unknowns, it would be incredibly irresponsible not to evacuate.
I think blaming the evacuation is wrong. You have look deeper, at the reason that an evacuation was necessary in the first place.
- mpweiher 9y ago> worse than Chernobyl Have you tracked the WHO assessments of the impact of Chernobyl? It turns out that there as well, the non-radiation effects (evacuation, psychological stress, etc.) far outweighed the radiation effects. > reason that an evacuation was necessary Apart from a core that was certainly necessary: hysteria, fueled by the mass media and an unscientific/unproven and almost certainly wrong model of the health risks of radiation exposure.