3 ms·
I had to look up who Graham Hancock is. The wikipedia article on him is less than complementary (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham_Hancock https://en.wikiped
by rbobby 9y ago
I had to look up who Graham Hancock is. The wikipedia article on him is less than complementary (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham_Hancock https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham_Hancock)... I wouldn't put any stock in his "theories" whatsoever.
- Alex3917 9y agoI mean if the Wikipedia article said otherwise then my comment wouldn’t really have been worth writing.
- Baeocystin 9y agoNot referring to Graham Hancock per se (I hadn't heard of him before this post) but when it comes to articles about people with even a hint of controversy around them, I would trust Wikipedia about as far as I could throw one of their server racks. It is always a good idea to at least check the talk page in addition to whatever is on the initial page.