4 ms·

I wasn't questioning his election. But if you have a history of shady business deals and long standing connections to less than scrupulous elements of the busin

I wasn't questioning his election. But if you have a history of shady business deals and long standing connections to less than scrupulous elements of the business world, why on earth you want to be President? It's the most scrutinized position in the world. Once you become President everyone watches your move with a microscope. For someone like Trump, who has a history of sketchy finances and dubious business practices, it seems attracting attention and investigation is the last thing you'd want. I guess critical thinking is "elitist self-congratulatory narcissism"? /s I also think it's funny that your post blasted the liberal arrogance in the most arrogant churlish way possible. Basically disproving your entire point. Nice to know that California doesn't have the condescending asshole market completely cornered ;)

ehvatum 9y ago
Our discussion is centered around perception and semiotics. How is it that Trump benefits from what you perceive as a liability? To you, his past dealings and the controversy surrounding him communicate that he should not be President of the United States. Yet, these dealings and this controversy are viewed by his base as bona fides. Applying critical thinking this problem is difficult when the concept of critical thinking itself has been abducted to mean "conclusion: Trump is bad". Diversity of thought, empathy, and dignity are not afforded to Trump supporters by the left. It certainly goes both ways, as can be seen by the degree to which his supporters support him out of spite for leftist orthodoxy. The complaint that the left heaps praise on Islam and non-European culture while denegrating Christianity and European culture is very real, and there is much to convince Trump supporters of this. Trump goes far out of his way to cause multiculturalist backers of tolerance and empathy to treat his supporters with disrespect, judgement, and complete lack of empathy. Rather than fretting about who is an asshole and who is good and just, I seek to understand what is happening and why.
- mlevental 9y ago
  These two things are very different: >why on earth you want to be President? >he should not be President of the United States

ehvatum 9y ago

Our discussion is centered around perception and semiotics. How is it that Trump benefits from what you perceive as a liability? To you, his past dealings and the controversy surrounding him communicate that he should not be President of the United States. Yet, these dealings and this controversy are viewed by his base as bona fides. Applying critical thinking this problem is difficult when the concept of critical thinking itself has been abducted to mean "conclusion: Trump is bad". Diversity of thought, empathy, and dignity are not afforded to Trump supporters by the left. It certainly goes both ways, as can be seen by the degree to which his supporters support him out of spite for leftist orthodoxy. The complaint that the left heaps praise on Islam and non-European culture while denegrating Christianity and European culture is very real, and there is much to convince Trump supporters of this. Trump goes far out of his way to cause multiculturalist backers of tolerance and empathy to treat his supporters with disrespect, judgement, and complete lack of empathy. Rather than fretting about who is an asshole and who is good and just, I seek to understand what is happening and why.

mlevental 9y ago
These two things are very different: >why on earth you want to be President? >he should not be President of the United States