3 ms·
I don't think the "that can change" characteristic is important here. You can declare that "for all values of width and height, w does not have to equal h" to
by PKop 9y ago
I don't think the "that can change" characteristic is important here.
You can declare that "for all values of width and height, w does not have to equal h" to be valid. Mutability is irrelevant.
- kqr 9y agoBut a rectangle as traditionally defined can have equal dimensions. Consider the rectangle whose width slowly grows to be longer than the height. Surely it does not skip a value because it happens to equal the height?
- PKop 9y ago"does not have to be equal" != "can't be equal". The set of all possible rectangles have w and h that can be different (or the same) values.