3 ms·
I saw somebody not too long ago say something like "I wonder if 30 years from now, ringing someone on the phone will be considered as rude as we now consider sh
by glhaynes 16y ago
I saw somebody not too long ago say something like "I wonder if 30 years from now, ringing someone on the phone will be considered as rude as we now consider showing up on their doorstep unannounced to be".
- electromagnetic 16y agoI think telemarketers are helping with this, especially when you start getting automated calls on your cell. When I know there's the automated calling going on, I won't answer a call unless the person is in my contacts (I don't want caller ID on my cell as it makes filtering much easier)
- stanleydrew 16y agoHave you put yourself on the ftc's do not call registry? Its pretty easy and I've found it effective: http://donotcall.gov/ http://donotcall.gov/
- jbrennan 16y agoIt is. It is and it always has been. Because since we've all had phones, we've been under a social contract with them. When the phone rings, you have about 30 seconds to choose between being ripped out of your current focus (work, reading, eating, in-person conversation, etc.) or to not answer at all (which can come off as rude). Sure, caller-ID and voicemail have mitigated these problems somewhat, but at the very least your concentration is broken when the telephone rings. Email and other textual messaging are much less invasive and you respond when you choose. Having said that, I do find some rare cases where a phone conversation is better than a textual one (complex but short instructions, for example).
- sprout 16y agoNot quite. If I'm, for example, naked in front of my computer, a phone call is not as big a problem as someone at my door. Especially if there are windows next to my door and the only path to my clothes goes in front of the door. (Just speaking hypothetically here.)