I think we do want to go that route. As opposed to supporting and arming dictatorships that suite our supposed interests at a given time. Then turning against t

I think we do want to go that route. As opposed to supporting and arming dictatorships that suite our supposed interests at a given time. Then turning against them, or arming their enemies when they don’t. If the US consistently practiced being a good global citizen, maybe one could make a case for “humanitarianism military intervention” in limited cases. What we have now is apparently open ended military activity, around the globe, for an indefinite timeframe. Most of the conflicts we are party to are civil wars, and by definition these are not “winnable.” As far as I can see, the US continues to wreak havoc on innocent civilians around the world to this day, with total impunity. This serves only the interests of the corporate military political complex. The fiasco of the US response to 9/11 beggars disbelief. It’s sickening how the propaganda apartatus in the US has shutdown virtually all reporting on what our armed forces are actually doing. Perhaps the worst of the US conduct is the continual supply of arms to States and factions in conflicts around the world, thereby radically increasing the lethality of the conflict. Of course, the US is not alone in this arms dealing, but this is something where we could unilaterally make a dramatic action towards world peace. Withdraw from current wars, end arms dealing, and work towards negotiated outcomes, where possible.