3 ms·
You still have not addressed any of the technical concerns raised by OP, but rather brought up some meaningless anecdotes. Why don't you refute the claims rega
by the_duke 9y ago
You still have not addressed any of the technical concerns raised by OP, but rather brought up some meaningless anecdotes.
Why don't you refute the claims regarding IO models (event based vs threading) instead, engaging in a proper discussion?
That would also prevent the downvotes you are receiving.
- phkamp 9y agoMoving a fifth of all HTTP traffic is not a meaningless anecdote in my vocabulary. And engaging in a debate about irelevant technical details applicability in Varnish, with a person who clearly has never actually run Varnish ? I have better things to do on a saturday.
- CJefferson 9y agoI'm not sure what you would want to see. The original post said, without evidence "vanish is unusably slow". Plainly, many large websites are using it successfully. How would one disprove accusations of slowness, without evidence, citations or benchmarks?
- sjwright 9y ago"What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitchens%27s_razor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitchens%27s_razor