4 ms·

Civ 3 feels like the right version with the level of detail vs fun.

• ordinaryperson 9y ago
  Civ 3 was good, I played way too much of that. The one big improvement of Civ 6 I can attest to is not having to build individual boats/ships for melee units once you have the appropriate skills -- just direct your helicopters to the oceans and they turn into transports. All good games. But a few simple adjustments would just really relieve a lot of the small annoyances.
  • isostatic 9y ago
    Civ 3 was great fun. I actually installed windows to play it when it came out. I remember one game, I was doing well, better than my neighbours, then oil appeared on the map. But not in my terrortry. This required an unprovoked war of expansion into a neighbour, and quickly, to gain control over this critical resource. Call to power was quite good too - with undersea, space, and future tech.
• ant6n 9y ago
  Civ 2 is better, it's got a bit less detail (i.e. less endless managing of cities...), and got the more aged graphics to boot. Then again, it's already got the the isometric perspective.