2 ms·
(edit: oy, this is a controversial comment? karma score is swinging wildly. I don't mean to suggest that China's social credit system is a good idea or that it
by throwawayjava 9y ago
(edit: oy, this is a controversial comment? karma score is swinging wildly. I don't mean to suggest that China's social credit system is a good idea or that it has an equivalent in the USA. It's just worth pointing out that China's own characterization of the system is pretty similar to how things work in the US...)
From the article:
> People who would be put on the restricted lists included those found to have committed acts like spreading false information about terrorism and causing trouble on flights, as well as those who used expired tickets or smoked on trains, according to two statements issued on the National Development and Reform Commission’s website on Friday.
The US may ban you from flying if you are politically controversial [1]+, get kicked off a flight [2, edit: 4], or sneak onto planes without a ticket [3].
Likewise, people who trespass on public transit are often barred from its use. And of course people who break traffic laws are (eventually) kicked off the roads.
I won't comment on whether the Chinese government's characterization of its laws is accurate or not (I don't speak any relevant language and don't know much about the culture, so all I have to go off of is western media). But at least according to the Chinese government, these rules are mostly in-line with how things often work in the US.
[1] https://theintercept.com/document/2014/07/23/march-2013-watchlisting-guidance/ https://theintercept.com/document/2014/07/23/march-2013-watc...
(edit: changed from http://mentalfloss.com/article/68073/8-ways-you-can-end-no-fly-list http://mentalfloss.com/article/68073/8-ways-you-can-end-no-f...)
[2] https://thepointsguy.com/2017/07/getting-banned-from-an-airline/ https://thepointsguy.com/2017/07/getting-banned-from-an-airl...
[3] e.g., http://wqad.com/2018/02/21/illinois-stowaway-woman-pleads-not-guilty-after-chicago-to-london-flight/ http://wqad.com/2018/02/21/illinois-stowaway-woman-pleads-no...
[4] http://www.nbcnews.com/id/39919229/ns/travel-news/t/can-bad-in-flight-behavior-land-you-no-fly-list/ http://www.nbcnews.com/id/39919229/ns/travel-news/t/can-bad-...
+ The "predictive assessments" (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/aug/10/us-no-fly-list-predictive-assessments https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/aug/10/us-no-fly-li...) used for putting people on the no-fly list are not very transparent and, IMO, reminiscent of a social credit system. It's extremely hard to imagine such a system that doesn't harshly penalize certain constitutionally protected speech (e.g., about Islam and US foreign policy in the ME).
- sgift 9y ago> The US will ban you from flying if you are politically controversial [1] The provided source doesn't support this claim. The only part which could even remotely be constructed as support for this claim would be 3 and the anecdata there include "He suspects" and "He thinks" - on the other, that you can end on such a list without knowing the reason (and often without recourse afair) is a real problem, but that's not what you claimed.
- throwawayjava 9y agoSo I suppose it's possible that a professor with controversial opinions ended up on a no-fly list for some reason completely unrelated to his politics. Occam's razor, though... There are other abuses that we have concrete evidence of. E.g., refusing the cooperate with the FBI. (https://ccrjustice.org/home/press-center/press-releases/lawsuit-exposes-fbi-abuse-no-fly-list-coerce-individuals-become https://ccrjustice.org/home/press-center/press-releases/laws...). Hell, up until 2005, the TSA used CREDIT SCORES as a component in deciding who should be on no-fly lists...
- davrosthedalek 9y agoYes, Occam's razor. Professors tend to hold controversial opinions. Random people will end up on the no-fly list. Sooner or later, that random person will be a professor with controversial opinions.
- throwawayjava 9y agohttps://theintercept.com/document/2014/07/23/march-2013-watchlisting-guidance/ https://theintercept.com/document/2014/07/23/march-2013-watc... DHS does not use social media posts alone to place someone on watch lists, but they are incorporated into predictive assessments. Given two people who are otherwise equivalent, the one with public stated controvsial opinions IS more likely to end up on a no-fly list. By the govt's own admission.
- AboutTheWhisles 9y ago