> Are we on a sustainable path? Should the EPA get more money or less? Right now they are getting a 25% cut. From my perspective, everything in government shou

> Are we on a sustainable path? Should the EPA get more money or less? Right now they are getting a 25% cut. From my perspective, everything in government should get less money. It's not so much a statement against the EPA as it is a statement that the federal government in particular is an order of magnitude too large and powerful. > it's not in the best interest of the general public, including future generations. I get where you're coming from, and sympathize with your position - but you've not supported this statement. How would cutting the EPA budget hurt us long-term? Can those effects be mitigated through other, less costly policies?