3 ms·
Oops, Vespasian wasn't Emperor in 43AD, that would have been Claudius. Vespasian was most likely present for the Roman invasion of Britain. He would become Empe
by vondur 9y ago
Oops, Vespasian wasn't Emperor in 43AD, that would have been Claudius. Vespasian was most likely present for the Roman invasion of Britain. He would become Emperor in AD 69.
- boomboomsubban 9y agoCerialis was appointed by Vespasian and fought the Brigantes, so it's more likely the year 43 was wrong and should have been ~71. Vespasian invaded Britannia in 43, probably confused the two.