5 ms·
No, this article is nonsense. Basically saying because nothing incredibly ground breaking has yet to come out of the LHC that it's a disappointment/failure. Fe
by the-pigeon 9y ago
No, this article is nonsense. Basically saying because nothing incredibly ground breaking has yet to come out of the LHC that it's a disappointment/failure.
Feels like saying SpaceX has failed because it hasn't put people on Mars yet.
- Erlangolem 9y agoIt might be more accurate to say that SpaceX has to frame their ventures in terms of fantastical Mars colonies for PR purposes, while the reality is less sexy, but more necessary LEO work.
- greglindahl 9y agoI'd be willing to bet that the overwhelming majority of SpaceX investors and employees understand how sexy partially-reusable and fully-reusable LEO rockets are.