3 ms·

The fine should be the same. No free lunch for someone who chooses to be a nurse instead of a portfolio manager.

• Ro93 9y ago
  the point of a fine is to act as a deterrent... billionaire isn't going to care about $100. They aren't going to care about $1000 either, but at least it's doing more social good.
  • commandlinefan 9y ago
    > care about $100 He will care if he loses his driver's license after a certain number of tickets, though, which is the law for everybody, equally applied.
    • russelluresti 9y ago
      In reality, even that isn't equal. A poor person who has moved out of the city because they can't afford housing inside of it losing their license would probably mean losing their job, as public transportation options may not even be available. A wealthy person could just hire an Uber everywhere and wouldn't even notice the cost. While the punishment is equal, the impact it would have on different populations is unequal (which is the same issue with a fine of an absolute amount).
• rahimnathwani 9y ago
  "No free lunch for someone who chooses to be a nurse instead of a portfolio manager." That's true. Portfolio managers are wined and dined pretty frequently by brokers and others who earn fees from the portfolio managers' employers. Nurses might occasionally get a $10 box of chocolates from a grateful patient.
• eertami 9y ago
  Yeah and while you're at it why not make tax a flat fee too?