> I think you are saying they can afford Mutually Assured Destruction? I hope they're not that crazy. Russia has been working on strategies for limited use of

> I think you are saying they can afford Mutually Assured Destruction? I hope they're not that crazy. Russia has been working on strategies for limited use of nuclear weapons; they don't believe in MAD. It's called Escalate to De-escalate: https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2017-02/escalate-de-escalate https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2017-02/escalate-... https://www.defensenews.com/smr/munich-security-forum/2018/02/17/escalate-to-de-escalate-us-and-russia-trade-jabs-on-nuclear-arms-use/ https://www.defensenews.com/smr/munich-security-forum/2018/0... https://thebulletin.org/why-russia-calls-limited-nuclear-strike-de-escalation https://thebulletin.org/why-russia-calls-limited-nuclear-str... It's as crazy as it sounds; a miscalculation could destroy humanity. Consider that their ability to significantly influence foreign publics through social media could be valuable for the de-escalation portion. No doubt we'll see people claiming (false) equivalency between Russia's and the U.S.'s actions - 'they bombed Japan, we bombed Ukraine'.