4 ms·
You don't need to burn someone alive to know that putting someone under certain heat conditions is going to kill them. Similarly, you don't need to actually exp
by make3 9y ago
You don't need to burn someone alive to know that putting someone under certain heat conditions is going to kill them. Similarly, you don't need to actually expose people to crazy powerful sonic waves to know that they would suffer from it; just knowing that the waves were there and inferring how to generate them is enough.
All of this is obvious though; you aren't being rational about this, like you have a dog in the race.
- mkempe 9y agoWhat's with the ad hominem? The authors themselves admit that their design and hypothetical weapon cannot account for the actual symptoms. Edit: when my kids finally convince me to get a dog for the family, I'll name it Truth, Facts, or Parmenides.