>Is it still correct / accurate to equate intelligence with IQ? IQ is simply a way to quantify intelligence. >I was under the impression that the IQ test has

>Is it still correct / accurate to equate intelligence with IQ? IQ is simply a way to quantify intelligence. >I was under the impression that the IQ test has a number of biases (e.g., cultural) that leave it flawed. There is actually no standardized way to measure IQ. You've heard criticisms of a certain test, but that is just one of many. There are tests that do no use any sort of cultural knowledge at all, such as Raven's Progressive Matrices. Theoretically, a cave man and a Harvard professor could reach the same score, assuming all other factors are the same. It only measures visual pattern recognition, but it is generally assumed that that is highly correlated with overall intelligence. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raven%27s_Progressive_Matrices https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raven%27s_Progressive_Matrices There are also g factor tests that attempt to measure overall intelligence. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G_factor_(psychometrics) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G_factor_(psychometrics) >or emotional intelligence Pretty much pseudoscience