4 ms·
If you don't have an organization that can break it down to a smaller projects then there is a question if doing it as one large project has a higher or lower
by dv_dt 9y ago
If you don't have an organization that can break it down to a smaller projects then there is a question if doing it as one large project has a higher or lower chance of failure.
- drieddust 9y agoShouldn't that depend upon complexity of change but who cares. CIO have a short tenure so collecting the bonuses and leaving before house of card collapses works. It's all about managing the personal bonus and career, who cares for the success 9f project?
- dv_dt 9y agoIt depends on complexity, but I think it's more of a situation akin to refactoring or rewriting a complex code base. A total rewrite is always an attractive thought, but a real focus on continuous refactoring in smaller portion at a time is often lower risk, lower cost, and faster in the end - and I suspect it's the same with large bureaucratic processes too. It's also a way to sharpen the skills of the organization in small steps with lower risks for failure (and improving future project steps...).