3 ms·
Nice pointing out typos of the authors of this piece while being unable to grasp even simple concepts of the English grammar yourself ('doesn't received'). Tha
by dna_polymerase 9y ago
Nice pointing out typos of the authors of this piece while being unable to grasp even simple concepts of the English grammar yourself ('doesn't received').
That said, the goodwill thing is clarified in the next sentence. Also, the text doesn't make the connection between goodwill and debt. In fact it is nice that you try to explain what 'most people' will think after reading this while in fact the only thing your post proofs is you poor understanding of intermediate level texts in english language.
I don't know why you try to discredit the text here.
- rahimnathwani 9y agoI don't sweat typos in my HN comments. They're not newspaper articles. I can assure you I'm able to grasp simple concepts of English grammar, but thanks for the feedback anyway! The connection between goodwill and debt isn't clarified in the next sentence. I stand by my point that a reader unfamiliar with goodwill would, after reading the article, understand it to be the result of debt. My comment about the article was motivated by the fact that I found it poorly written by the standards of newspaper journalism. No other reason.