2 ms·You could use ".get()." instead of "->", but I don't see how that helps.by kolpa 9y agoYou could use ".get()." instead of "->", but I don't see how that helps.ZephyrP 9y agoWell I guess you're safe against UAF! (har har)fjsolwmv 9y agoCorrection: "(foo)." or smart pointer (foo.get())." instead of "foo->". But I still don't see how that would help.