3 ms·

I have no idea why I'm replying to you, because as I noted I don't really think you're interested in anything except confirming your bias, but: People are list

I have no idea why I'm replying to you, because as I noted I don't really think you're interested in anything except confirming your bias, but: People are listing "telling the time (duh)" because it's OBVIOUSLY a watch. I guess I could assemble a face that doesn't include the time, but I certainly haven't wanted to. Obviously I consult it for the time several times a day. Obviously, that's the primary role of a wristwatch. I suspect people here, like myself, have omitted "telling the time" when outlining reasons the Apple Watch is useful are doing so because, duh, it's a watch. It tells time. Incidentally, there remain no small number of manual-wind watches in use that require daily winding. Are they also examples of the worst watches ever made?

exodust 9y ago
> as I noted I don't really think you're interested in anything except confirming your bias Stop pretending you know what motivates my contributions, that's rude. Bias? We're talking about a tech product, not immigration policy. I am not loyal to any brand, I own examples of most brands and will praise or criticise as needed, as anyone should. Brand loyalty is where you'll find bias, so perhaps take a look in the mirror. "Duh" is a silly word to use on any occasion. When used as part of an answer to a question, you risk giving the impression the questioner has asked a stupid question. "Duh" does not mean "obviously". If you're standing or sitting with arms folded then look down at the time, you may see a blank screen, therefore the primary role of your wristwatch is inferior to even those watches that require daily winding. And no, I would not describe a watch that requires daily winding as a great watch. I look forward to vastly improved battery life in smart watches and more hybrid-mechanical or traditional digital watch design so that the watch part is not an "app". It doesn't seem like you can discuss the product without going after the person, so hopefully this interaction is at an end.
- ubermonkey 9y ago
  >I am not loyal to any brand, I own examples of most brands and will praise or criticise as needed, as anyone should. Ah, the brave one, speaking truth when others are clouded by bias! >this interaction is at an end Thank God.

exodust 9y ago

> as I noted I don't really think you're interested in anything except confirming your bias Stop pretending you know what motivates my contributions, that's rude. Bias? We're talking about a tech product, not immigration policy. I am not loyal to any brand, I own examples of most brands and will praise or criticise as needed, as anyone should. Brand loyalty is where you'll find bias, so perhaps take a look in the mirror. "Duh" is a silly word to use on any occasion. When used as part of an answer to a question, you risk giving the impression the questioner has asked a stupid question. "Duh" does not mean "obviously". If you're standing or sitting with arms folded then look down at the time, you may see a blank screen, therefore the primary role of your wristwatch is inferior to even those watches that require daily winding. And no, I would not describe a watch that requires daily winding as a great watch. I look forward to vastly improved battery life in smart watches and more hybrid-mechanical or traditional digital watch design so that the watch part is not an "app". It doesn't seem like you can discuss the product without going after the person, so hopefully this interaction is at an end.

ubermonkey 9y ago
>I am not loyal to any brand, I own examples of most brands and will praise or criticise as needed, as anyone should. Ah, the brave one, speaking truth when others are clouded by bias! >this interaction is at an end Thank God.