4 ms·
So it has to go from 7 tx/sec to 7k tx/sec or it's not worth doing?
by walls 9y ago
So it has to go from 7 tx/sec to 7k tx/sec or it's not worth doing?
- Ajedi32 9y agoNo, but if you're someone who wants to see Bitcoin succeed then you probably don't want to use a scaling solution which only works if you assume Bitcoin will never achieve mainstream adoption.
- walls 9y ago> you probably don't want to use a scaling solution which only works if you assume Bitcoin will never achieve mainstream adoption But, that's exactly what happened with segwit. Why is that worth doing but increasing the block size is not?
- Ajedi32 9y agoIf I recall correctly, Segwit was a prerequisite to Lightning. A block size increase is not.
- SuddsMcDuff 9y agoYou recall incorrectly. A malleability fix was a prerequisite to Lightning. SegWit is just one of many possible malleability fixes.
- Ajedi32 9y agoWere there any other serious proposals for fixing transaction malleability without Segwit?
- eklitzke 9y agoThe main thing Segwit fixes is transaction malleability (which is necessary for Lightning).