3 ms·
90's? Still doing that in the 2010's! https://techcrunch.com/2011/03/24/color-com-was-acquired-for-350000-the-domain-name-that-is/ https://techcrunch.com/2011/
by wlesieutre 9y ago
90's? Still doing that in the 2010's!
https://techcrunch.com/2011/03/24/color-com-was-acquired-for-350000-the-domain-name-that-is/ https://techcrunch.com/2011/03/24/color-com-was-acquired-for...
- zodPod 9y agoOh my god, TechCrunch's site is annoying. Wtf the fuck is with the check mark and removal of contrast when you get to the bottom of the article? It's like "Oh for the last 3 paragraphs we're going to make it slightly harder to read this." Man why can't companies just let us read text without trying to make some big stupid extra functionality?
- r00fus 9y agoFor me once I scrolled to the bottom it just auto-navigated me to some other article. Scrolling up didn't take me back. UX Fail.
- beart 9y agoI accidentally scrolled down too far to see what you were talking about and the article automatically closed. Guess I didn't want to read it.
- Bartweiss 9y agoI like the contrast removal - it warns me when I'm getting too near the arbitrary spot where scrolling down sudden becomes a redirect to a new page! Mind, what I really like is not using the new TechCrunch site at all. Maybe I'll read a cached version if that plays nicely.
- acdha 9y agoI was trying to get at how long we’ve known that it’s what you do when your senior management needs replacing, but you’re right that it’s been a continuous problem.