> Law of averages, those who do make it are hard working and intelligent. Law of averages, those who do not are often less so. I don't know how you came up wit

> Law of averages, those who do make it are hard working and intelligent. Law of averages, those who do not are often less so. I don't know how you came up with this "law of averages" but I do know that you haven't seen the paper's results. > Take "power" from [Hard working and intelligent]U[Scott Disick, Donald JR] to normalize influence across everyone? Limiting the creation of powerful feudal lords that are close to matching in power a democratic society's government is not the same as normalizing influence across everyone. Our choices aren't limited to feudalism and communism. > Should the group, who by and large, has contributed more to the society not have proportionally more say? That is a question of values, and you may have different ones, but the values on which democracies are founded say no (whether or not those values are actually realized is a different question). Less democratic societies say yes. I am not saying that a democracy is absolutely superior to an oligarchy, but you must understand where your values lie. All things considered, I value democracy more.