7 ms·
Ask HN: What stack you use to build websites?
- tmaly 9y agoright now I am using a Go framework called Gin for my food site. I use libsass with bourbon.io and I have a Makefile to compile the binary, generate the css, minify things. For blogging, I have used Wordpress But I have recently started looking on moving over to Hugo to generate html using a bootstrap 4 template.
- tmastro 9y agoMainly Ruby on Rails
- jwho82 9y agoLAMP with Symfony. Ionic for mobile dev.
- theandrewbailey 9y agoFor work, server-side Javascript (not Node.js) For fun, Java servlets/JSPs
- RandomBK 9y agoAre you able to talk a bit about your server-side Javascript setup? What was your decision making process for using something other than Node? How does the ecosystem of libraries and supporting infrastructure look like?
- theandrewbailey 9y agoIt's not something that I chose in particular. I work at a Salesforce Commerce Cloud[0] partner, with half a dozen clients. The language syntax is Javascript (in fact, I'm sure that it's built on the JVM's JS engine), but uses a proprietary API. The platform is laser focused on doing scaleable e-commerce, although it has somewhat competent CMS and CDN functionality, at least enough as necessary to load pages fast and sell things. Once you start doing things like newsletter list management, file uploads, and even product reviews, its less than optimal. [0] https://www.demandware.com/ https://www.demandware.com/
- jimmy162 9y agoVapor - Swift on the server! If you haven't heard of it, check out https://vapor.codes https://vapor.codes. It's an absolutely amazing framework that is non-blocking in version 3. The performance you can squeeze out of it is unbelievable.
- bobwaycott 9y agoJust websites? Static HTML and assets, served from Caddy.
- bgdkbtv 9y agoLaravel, Vue, Postgres. Experimenting with Laravel/Lumen API only for backend, and NuxtJS with SSR. Also AdonisJS is looking promising to go into that JS world with both front and back ends.
- sonaltr 9y agofor work: nodejs + react (usually serverless, but if not, then with k8s/ecs) for experimenting: golang + react (want to see what the fuss is all about) for fun: elixir + pheonix (since I never got on the rails bandwagon)
- adtac 9y agoI'm getting very comfortable with plain Go without any frameworks for the backend. Postgres for databases. For a quick prototype, I'd use Vue.js and Spectre for CSS. I suck at frontend anyway. Deployed behind nginx.
- kusmi 9y agoLua/Torch backend + Redis + React
- ravenstine 9y agoIt depends on what you mean by a website. If it's one level above a static page, a static site with frequent changes, I'll make my own build chain in Node.js with Gulp and host the pages in S3 and Cloudfront. Or I will use Rails behind Nginx if the site is more dynamic. Each release would get built into a Docker image and be deployed that way. HAProxy would be there mostly to forward requests to multiple apps if there are any. For a site that needs a lot of client side scripting, I use Ember. I'm so happy with it that I will probably use it with Fastboot for those times I would have used Rails. In terms of databases, I've been using CouchDB unless I had an overwhelming need for relational records. It saves time because CRUD and websocket/eventsource/longpolling come with it out of the box.
- franzcusmai 9y agoLamp with CakePhp
- kaniskode 9y agoFlask or Django for dynamic sites. Jekyll hosted with Netlify for static sites.
- EliRivers 9y agoI'm writing the HTML and CSS in Emacs, applying common elements with Make, and feeding it to an Apache server over on NearlyFreeSpeech.
- rs86 9y agoWe mostly do rails apps but one of our 4 projects use elixir/phoenix on the backend and react on the frontend. We are really pleased with the performance of BEAM and the functional flavor of elixir clearly leads to code that is easier do read and to test. We have been toying with Elm lately.
- RobGav 9y agoStatic website built and managed by Publii CMS.
- rogual 9y agoAlmost always Django. Customers love Django Admin, and when they don't, it's really easy to tweak. For dynamic apps that don't fit the Django model, I'll bust out Node.js, and for static sites, just a plain Python script to generate HTML files. Boring choices, but the older I get, the more I'm OK with that :)
- markfer 9y agoFor someone looking to learn to code web-app's from scratch, would you advise Django over Vanilla JS, Node, or Vue?
- nocobot 9y agoI don't think it's that important what technology you decide to learn first, largely because learning new languages / tech stacks gets easier as your frame of reference grows. What I think is important is sticking to one thing until you have a good grasp of it.
- rogual 9y agoIf I were you I'd want to really good with plain Python (or Node) before learning a framework, but that's because I'm the kind of person who wants to know how everything works. Once you've written a few CRUD apps you'll wish there was a tool to do some of the common stuff for you, and Django will be waiting for you. But, if you're not that kind of person it's perfectly OK to jump straight into Django. You'll certainly get further more quickly, even if you won't be able to explain exactly what your code is doing.
- nkristoffersen 9y agoStatic sites: GatsbyJS on S3 or Firebase hosting. Web apps: ReactJS on s3 hitting NodeJS API on AWS EB.
- jasonroot 9y agoHTML/CSS/JS & LAMP with Craft CMS for dynamic sites, just HTML/CSS/JS on S3 for static sites.
- spondyl 9y agoFor anything dynamic, I usually start with Django but I'm not opposed to building with Node and React For my personal site, I rebuild it in whatever language I'm trying to learn. In this case, I'm rewriting part of it in golang which I use at work.
- m_fayer 9y agoASP.NET Core. VueJS on the frontend if it's a webapp. Jekyll if it doesn't need to by dynamic.
- matthewmacleod 9y agoLinux, PostgreSQL, Rails, Webpack, React and Sass. For the most part. This is a great solution for general-purpose use, dropping React of course if there’s no need for interactivity.
- niftylettuce 9y agohttps://lad.js.org https://lad.js.org
- mbn12 9y agoFor sadomasochism: assembly
- pdeuchler 9y agoSame but DotNetNuke
- vyrotek 9y agoASP.NET Core + Vue/Ang/React + SQL Server on Azure
- SnowingXIV 9y agoBasic websites? Probably Jekyll with some build tools like gulp. Never needed anything more for that. Otherwise Rails with PostgreSQL.
- xstartup 9y agoPostGres, Redis, Go, Vue. Why? because I am able, not able to understand anything else.
- larryfreeman 9y agoI'm thinking about going with Clojure for a POC. Anyone using Clojure?
- manitoo 9y agoExcellent choice. Two of the best reasons to recommend: 1. Hiccup syntax is a great way to “template” HTML, being clojure-native data structures with the full power of the language available to you. 2. REPL-driven workflow makes it a dream to debug things like request handlers. You will miss out on some perks from bigger/more popular frameworks—there’s no built-in admin panel waiting for you—but you can take advantage of the Lisp Curse here and quickly build out what’s missing. I find it’s a worthwhile trade-off.
- LukeTowers 9y agoOctoberCMS running on a LNAMP stack
- komuW 9y agoLanguage: Go, Framework: https://github.com/apex/up https://github.com/apex/up Hosting: AWS lambda I can't speak highly enough of up, it's amazing for creating serverless(sic) apps without changing the way you structure your app. I also use up for some python apps
- kromem 9y agoHow much slower are web requests vs a live server? I see that Up has a warming feature - is that sufficient enough to avoid slow requests for you? Does the reliance on Up as a service make you nervous for using them for production? How much hot water would you be in if they close their doors? Are you using Up Pro? I know - lots of questions, but it seems like a neat offering I hadn't seen before, and I can't find any testimonials elsewhere online.
- komuW 9y agoHi, 1. Apart from the startup latency i haven't noticed much of a big difference between up/lambda and a live server. And lambda will keep your function warm for AFAIK, 1hr, so if your app has lots of traffic you never experience startup latency. 2. Up is open source, if they close their biz, I'd just continue using their code. I haven't used up pro yet. 3. Up has been around for probably under 1yr so you may not see a lot of testimonials yet. It is made by tj(the same guy who made expressJS, the nodejs web framework among other softwares) You can direct more questions ; https://up.docs.apex.sh/#links https://up.docs.apex.sh/#links
- jetti 9y agoFor work, VueJs and ASP.NET MVC (on .NET 4.6.2, not core). For fun, a mixture of VueJs and Elixir/Phoenix and ASP.NET Core
- neverminder 9y agoBackend language: Scala. Long live FP and type safety. Backend framework: Play. Inspired by RoR, works with Java/Scala. Light, fast, scalable out of the box. Database: PostgreSQL. Introduction is not needed. Database library: Slick. Nothing beats compile time type safety. Frontend language: Typescript. Better than pure JS hands down. Frontend framework: Angular (5). Because Typescript is a first class citizen.
- abhishekjha 9y agoI have a question. How do you speed up the database CRUD operations when the number of records fitting a certain criteria may range to 10000 or more. It takes a lot of time to get this over the network and the user is not going to use/see all of it at once. Given such constraints, how do you speed up the query so that there's little to no lag time for the user(at least for say first 100 records).
- kromem 9y agoGo & Postgresql on the server. Angular 2+ on the frontend. Why? Go is fast and bare bones, and works nicely as a backbone to an API (especially with a GraphQL intermediary). Postgresql plays very nicely with Go, especially if writing queries by hand. Angular 2+ is great. Vue is also really nice, but I love what Typescript brings to the table and find that Angular being built around TS makes me enjoy it more than retrofitting Vue + TS definitions. I decided on Angular 2+ with great trepidation, but the bad rap carry-over from AngularJS turned out to be entirely undesreved. It's a wonderful framework, and I'm enjoying it greatly. Also, a shout-out for AWS Lambda. I use it here and there for heavy workloads (personally I wouldn't replace my webserver with it entirely yet), and it made my server infrastructure MUCH more pleasant.